Info@liblaw.org

Varne et al v RL LRSC 1_ 1 LLR 242 (1893)

  VARNE, VOMBO, GINDA and MOMORA SINGBY, Appellants, vs. REPUBLIC OF LIBERIA, Appellee.

[January Term, A. D. 1893.]

Appeal from the Court of Quarter Sessions and Common Pleas, Montserrado County.

Misdemeanor.

The appellate court will not take cognizance of any matter of law to which the attention of the lower court does not appear to have been called. Where an irregularity in the process and returns was not brought to the notice of the court of inferior jurisdiction, the appellate court will not entertain a motion bearing thereon.

This case comes up before us upon a bill of exceptions taken to the rulings and judgment of the Court of Quarter Sessions of Montserrado County at its June session, A. D. 1891. At the call of this case the appellants, through counsel, submitted for the consideration of this court a motion in arrest of judgment. The said motion embraces the following points: That the bonds of the appellants and the writ of arrest do not appear upon the record of this case.

 

The court on inspection of the entire record in this case, takes occasion to say that not only the rule of practice, but the law, requires that in all appeals taken to this court by bills of exceptions the questions of law relied upon must be raised in the court having original jurisdiction over the case. The record in this case nowhere shows wherein the attention of the court below has been called to any irregularity in either the service of the writ or the return thereon as raised in the appellants’ motion. The statute of the Republic regulating appeals is emphatic in language: “The court to which the appeal may be taken shall examine the matter in dispute upon the record only; it shall receive no additional evidence, and shall reverse no judgment, for any defect of form, or for any matter to which the attention of the court below shall not appear to have been called, either by some bill of exceptions or other parts of the record.” In observation of this positive statute the court adjudges that the appeal is dismissed.

 

Key Description: Appeal and Error (Grounds of action or relief, relief not asked below)

File Type: pdf
Tags: appeal and error, appeal dismissed, Appellate Court Refusal to Consider Unpreserved Issues, appellate jurisdiction, appellate procedure, Appellate Review Confined to the Record, Appellate Review Limited to Issues Raised Below, Bill of Exceptions, Certified Trial Court Record, Completeness of Trial Court Record, Court of Quarter Sessions and Common Pleas, Court of Quarter Sessions Montserrado County, Criminal Appeal, criminal appearance bond, Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure, Defective Return of Process, Defects of Form, Defendants' Bonds, Dismissal of Criminal Appeal, Examination of Record Only, Exceptions to Trial Court Rulings, Failure to Challenge Process in Trial Court, Failure to Object to Missing Court Documents, Failure to Preserve Issues for Appellate Review, Failure to Raise Irregularities in Writ and Returns, Finality of Trial Court Proceedings, Ginda, Ginda and Momora Singby v. Republic of Liberia, Grounds for Arrest of Judgment, Grounds of Action or Relief, Grounds of Appeal, Improper Motion in Arrest of Judgment, Irregularities in Criminal Process, Irregularities in Service of Process, Issues Not Raised in Lower Court, January Term 1893, Judicial Restraint in Appellate Review, June Term 1891, jurisdiction of trial court, Legal Issues in Bill of Exceptions, Limits of Appellate Jurisdiction, Mandatory Compliance with Appellate Rules, Matters Not Presented to Trial Court, misdemeanor, Missing Bonds from Court Record, Missing Writ of Arrest from Record, Momora Singby, Montserrado County, motion in arrest of judgment, Motion in Arrest of Judgment on Appeal, Motion to Arrest Judgment, New Issues Raised on Appeal, no additional evidence on appeal, original jurisdiction, Preservation of Issues for Appeal, Preservation of Legal Objections, Procedural Default, procedural irregularities, Prohibition Against Raising New Issues on Appeal, Prohibition Against Receiving New Evidence on Appeal, Questions of Law on Appeal, record on appeal, Relief Not Asked Below, Republic of Liberia, Requirement to Object in Lower Court, Requirement to Raise Questions of Law Before Trial Court, Return of Writ of Arrest, Statutory Grounds for Reversal, Statutory interpretation, Statutory Limitations on Appellate Review, Statutory Regulation of Appeals, sufficiency of bill of exceptions, Supreme Court of Liberia, Supreme Court Opinion, Supreme Court Precedent on Appeal and Error, Supreme Court Precedent on Appellate Review Limited to the Record, Supreme Court Precedent on Bill of Exceptions, Supreme Court Precedent on Defects in Criminal Process, Supreme Court Precedent on Dismissal of Criminal Appeal, Supreme Court Precedent on Missing Documents from Court Record, Supreme Court Precedent on Motion in Arrest of Judgment, Supreme Court Precedent on Preservation of Issues for Appeal, Supreme Court Precedent on Prohibition Against New Evidence on Appeal, Supreme Court Precedent on Relief Not Asked Below, Supreme Court Precedent on Return of Process, Supreme Court Precedent on Waiver of Unraised Objections, Supreme Court Precedent on Writ of Arrest, Varne, Varne et al. v. Republic of Liberia, Vombo, waiver of procedural defects, Waiver of Unraised Objections, writ of arrest