CHARLIE MANADEE SILLAH, Plaintiff in Error, v. SAMUEL B. G. STEPNEY, et al.,

Defendants in Error. JUDGMENT WITHOUT OPINION. * Decided April 23, 1976. When this case was called, Counsellor Edward Carlor appeared for the plaintiff in error, and Counsellor Peter Amos George appeared for the defendants in error. After studying the record of the trial court, the ruling of the Justice in chambers, and hearing arguments on both sides, it is adjudged that the ruling of the Justice in chambers should be and the same is hereby affirmed, with costs to abide final determination. The Clerk of this Court is ordered to send a mandate to the Civil Law Court below, commanding the judge therein to resume jurisdiction over the summary ejectment suit and send it back to the Magistrate Court in Monrovia to be heard anew, allowing any dissatisfied party to appeal to the Circuit Court. Should judgment upon hearing de novo in the Circuit Court dissatisfy any party, he would then have a right of appeal to the Supreme Court. It is also our orders that this case should have priority over other cases now pending in the Magistrate Court, and to be determined without delay. And it is so ordered. Mr. Justice Wordsworth having presided over this case in chambers did not take part in the decision. 250