BOIMA LARTEY, et al., Appellants, v. ALH AR V. CORN EH, et al., Appellees.

JUDGMENT WITHOUT OPIN ION. Decided April 23, 1976.* When this case was called, Counsellor D. Caesar Harri s appeared for the appellants, and Counsellor Moses K. Yangbe appeared for the appellees and filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the appeal bond was defective, in that it failed to conform with the Civil Procedure Law which requires that the affidavit of the sureties accompanying the bond should contain “a description of the property, sufficiently identified to establish the lien of the bond.” Rev. Code i :63.2 (3 ). After studying the record, the motion, and the resistance and hearing argument on both sides, it is adjudged that the motion should be and the same is hereby granted and the appeal is dismissed, with costs against the appellants. And the Clerk of this Court is ordered to send a mandate to the court below commanding the judge therein to resume jurisdiction and enforce his judgment. And it is so ordered. *Mr. Justice A zango (lid not participate in this decision. 248