James Z. Momo, by and thru his Attorney in Fact, George Lansana Fallah, of the City of Monrovia Liberia MOVANT Versus Solomon Ngekia, Hawa Fahnbul!eh, Ansumana Sheriff, Beatrice Johnson, Madam Kumba Kabapp, Musu Swaray, Morris Sayon, George Kunkeh, Tamba Samuel, Kofi Sayon, K.D. Enterprise, Fredrick K. C. Fred, Chike Akuneto, Mr. Benson T. Ngerlikeh, Fredrick Eme, Foma Toure, Mr. Angle Kollie, William Leapay and Branco Business Center all of the Red Light, Paynesville City, Montserrado County, Liberia RESPONDENTS

Motion to Dismiss Appeal

Appeal

ACTION OF EJECTMENT

JUDGMENT WITHOUT OPINION

When this case was called for hearing, Counsellor Nyenati Tuan of Tuan Wreh Law Firm appeared for the movants/appellees. Counsellor Thompson N. Jargba of the Law Offices of Jargba & Jargba appeared for the respondents/appellants.

Following the Court’s notation of representation by the parties, counsel for the movants/ appellees asked leave of Court and was granted permission by the Court to make a submission upon the records of the Court, wherein he called the Court’s attention to a motion to dismiss the appeal filed by the movants/appellees. The motion averred that while the respondents/appellants had complied with the statutory time for filing of documents for the completion of their appeal, they had failed to exhibit a valid tax clearance in support of

JUDICIAL BRANCH

TEMPLE OFJUSTICE

MONROVIA, LIBERIA

ASSOCIATE JUSTICE

SUPREME COVRT OF LIBERIA

the appeal bond, as required by law. This defect in the appeal bond, the movants said, deprived the Supreme Court of jurisdiction to hear the appeal on the merits.

A review of the records showed that contrary to the allegations made by the movants, the respondents had indeed complied with all of the statutory requirements for the taking and completion of an appeal to this. Court and that the appeal bond did not show defect warranting the dismissal of the appeal’. This Court notes, and as confirmed by counsel for the movants, that the surety to the respondents appeal bond had in fact complied with the standards relative to the validity of an appeal bond as articulated in various cases decided by this Court, including the annexation of a valid business registration document, the surety’s articles of incorporation authorizing the insurance company to serve as surety to appeal bonds in this Republic, and exhibition of a valid certificate from the Central Bank indicating the financial viability of the surety to the respondents/appellants’ appeal bond.

The movants’ counsel, not having challenged the authenticity of the certificate from the Central Bank of Liberia attesting to the financial viability of the respondents/appellants’ surety, a dismissal of the appeal on the ground that at the time of execution of the appeal bond, the date stated on the tax clearance had expired is deemed by this Court to be a mere legal technicality that does not affect the validity of the bond to warrant dismissing the appeal. It is that law that “the intent of the Legislature in passing the Act setting the grounds for dismissing an appeal was primarily to discourage the dismissal of appeals on technical grounds and to give the appellants an opportunity to have their cases heard by the Supreme Court on their merits.” Forestry Development Authority v. Forestry Development Authority Workers Union (FDAWU), 39 LLR 684 (1999); Hussenni v. Brumskine, Supreme Court Opinion, March Term, A. D. 2013.

Accordingly, and in view of the foregoing, it is hereby

JUDICIAL BRANCH

TEMPLE OFJUSTICE

MONROVIA, LIBERIA

ASSOCIATE TICE

SUPREME COURT OF LIBERIA

ADJUDGED:

That the motion to dismiss the appeal, being without legal merits and not supported by the records, is hereby denied. The Clerk of this Court is ordered to docket the main suit for a determination of the appeal on its merits. AND IT IS HEREBY SO ORDERED.

GIVEN UNDER OUR HANDS AND SEAL OF THE

SUPREME COURT THIS 10TH DAY OF MAY, A. D. 2018

ASSOCIATE JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT OF LIBERIA

I-A.e

ASSOCIATE JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT OF LtBERlA

ASSOCIATE JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT OF LIBERIA

Download

File Type: pdf

Tags: 2018 Supreme Court Judgment, action of ejectment, Angle Kollie, Ansumana Sheriff, Appeal, Appeal bond, appeal bond compliance, Appeal Bond Requirements, appellate jurisdiction, appellate procedure, Articles of Incorporation, authenticity of surety documents, avoidance of technical dismissal, Beatrice Johnson, Benson T. Ngerlikeh, Branco Business Center, business registration, Central Bank of Liberia certificate, certificate of financial viability, Chike Akuneto, Civil Procedure Law, completion of appeal, defective appeal bond, denial of motion to dismiss, determination on the merits, dismissal of appeal, dismissal on technical grounds, docketing of appeal, Ejectment, expired tax clearance, Foma Toure, Forestry Development Authority v. Forestry Development Authority Workers Union, Fredrick Eme, Fredrick K. C. Fred, George Kunkeh, George Lansana Fallah, Hawa Fahnbuleh, hearing on the merits, Hussenni v. Brumskine, insurance company as surety, insurance surety, James Z. Momo, judgment without opinion, K.D. Enterprise, Kofi Sayon, Kumba Kabapp, Land Dispute, Legal Technicality, mandatory appellate requirements, Monrovia, Montserrado County, Morris Sayon, Motion to dismiss appeal, motion without legal merit, Musu Swaray, perfection of appeal, preference for determination on the merits, real property dispute, Solomon Ngekia, statutory requirements for appeal, sufficiency of appeal bond, Supreme Court jurisdiction, Supreme Court of Liberia, surety assets, surety financial viability, Surety Qualification, Tamba Samuel, tax clearance, technical defect in appeal bond, Temple of Justice, validity of appeal bond, validity of tax clearance, William Leapay